But Alex’s professor doesn’t like it. She underlines the first two sentences, and she writes, “This is simply too general. Arrive at the true point.” She underlines the next and fourth sentences, and she writes, “You’re just restating the question I inquired. What’s your point?” She underlines the sentence that is final and then writes when you look at the margin, “What’s your thesis?” because the very last sentence into the paragraph only lists topics. It doesn’t make a disagreement.
Is Alex’s professor just a grouch? Well, no—she is trying to show this student that college writing isn’t about following a formula (the model that is five-paragraph, it’s about making a disagreement. Her first sentence is general, just how she learned a five-paragraph essay should start. But through the professor’s perspective, it is way too general—so general, in fact, that it’s completely not in the assignment: she didn’t ask students to define civil war. The third and fourth sentences say, in so many words, they just restate the prompt, without giving a single hint about where this student’s paper is going“ I am comparing and contrasting the reasons why the North and the South fought the Civil War”—as the professor says. The sentence that is final which should make a quarrel, only lists topics; it does not start to explore how or why something happened. Pokračování textu This will be a vintage essay introduction that is five-paragraph.