Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney
A New York State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording november
In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that will enable several casino that is new to be built through the entire state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is effective, that referendum shall be halted due to language within the ballot question which he claims violates state law.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum features a wide range of ‚legislative purposes‘ that paint the proposal in a light that is unmistakably positive. For instance, the concern mentions ‚promoting job growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting neighborhood governments to lower property taxes.‘ That language was authorized by the State Board of Elections in July.
But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York law. According to case filed into the nyc State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution’s prohibition on the employment of public profit the aid of ‚private undertakings.‘
‚The Constitution is pretty clear that you can’t use general public money to sway or influence a vote,‘ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the one that is only has brought up problems with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also see it as one-sided, and spiritual teams have also noted the language used whenever telling parishioners to consider social ills that could attend the advertised great things about casino expansion. Pokračování textu Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney